Picture this: it's annual pay review time, and you're staring down the barrel of another gruelling week juggling spreadsheets, chasing recruitment consultants, and trying to make sense of conflicting salary data. Sound familiar? You're not alone.
For Mando Group, a 40-strong digital consultancy in Liverpool, this was their reality until recently. As a platinum Optimizely partner serving enterprise clients, they knew their people were their biggest asset. But proving their worth through fair compensation? That was proving to be quite the headache.
The Great British Salary Benchmarking Struggle
Let's be honest - the UK digital sector has been through the wringer lately. With pitch win rates falling to 52% (8% lower than last year), 84% of agencies reporting their biggest challenge is pressure on client budgets and average headcount dropping by 6%, getting compensation right has never been more critical. Digital marketers across the UK are commanding £50,000-£69,999 on average, with London and the South East pushing salaries 10-20% higher.
Add to that the post-pandemic shift to hybrid working - now embraced by 28% of UK workers - and you've got a perfect storm of challenges.

When talent is harder to attract and even harder to keep engaged, getting pay decisions spot-on isn't just nice to have - it's essential for survival.
The Old Way: Death by a Thousand Spreadsheets
Before discovering Compensation IQ, Mando Group's approach to salary benchmarking was, frankly, a bit of a nightmare. Deanne walked us through the process with the kind of hard-earned clarity that only comes from seeing it all before
Our process was always extraction of salary data into a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet had been produced by finance and gave us columns with things like whether they were part-time, total package including salaries, then it modelled what percentage pay increases would look like.
But that was just the beginning. The real slog involved:
- Ringing round recruitment agencies - only two or three on their books
- Trawling through Hays and Reed salary reports - hoping for something relevant
- Manually scanning job adverts for similar roles in similar-sized companies
- Playing detective to spot outliers and inconsistencies
"It was all generic information," Deanne explains. "Obviously the job adverts were a little bit more tailored, but it was just broad and very time-consuming."
How time-consuming? Try 2-3 solid days of intensive work. And even then, when presenting findings to the finance team, there was always that nagging doubt: is this data actually defensible?
The customer admits: "We are very lucky to have a stable workforce and therefore don't need to recruit much. When we do, or to support with promotions, it was difficult to find suitable benchmark data to ensure we were paying at the right rate."

Enter Compensation IQ: Right Place, Right Time
Sometimes timing is everything. Mando Group first heard about Compensation IQ through their membership with the British Interactive Media Association (BIMA) - just as they were gearing up for their annual pay review process.
To be honest, it came at the right time for us. I first spoke to the Compensation IQ team just as we were starting the pay review process. If it had come two or three months later, we'd have already been through this exercise and it wouldn't have been appropriate.
But here's the thing – what started as a solution for their immediate pay review needs quickly revealed itself to be so much more.
The transformation
The difference was immediate and dramatic. Where the old process took the better part of a week, Compensation IQ streamlined everything into a matter of hours.
Using the API to import the data was really useful because you don't need to cross-check and match everything. It's all there as it should be. It probably took a couple of hours just to double-check the alignment and make sure our quite niche job titles had parity.
But the real game-changer wasn't just the time saving – it was the quality of insights. For the first time, they had access to percentile data, not just basic salary bands.
We were able to see for a couple of roles where we were out of sync because we had the median and the percentiles. We could understand where we want to pay and then target and align where anybody was out of sync with that. We just didn't have that before.

Real results: the frontline reality
The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. When the HR Team presented their findings to the directors, they had some particularly telling cases including:
The Undervalued Star
"We knew there was value and we knew there was a pay increase coming. We probably wouldn't have known where to position that pay increase. The data showed that individual was underpaid compared to the rest of our percentiles, so we were able to bring that in line."
Deanne is refreshingly honest about the impact. "When that data was presented to directors alongside the performance reviews, we could say with confidence that this individual needs a salary increase of this amount because they're out of line with the rest of our profile. There was probably a slightly larger increase than they might have received without that data. We might have been more cautious and reserved."
Beyond the annual review: year-round value
Here's where things get really interesting. What Mando Group initially saw as an annual pay review tool quickly revealed its ongoing value throughout the year.
"We went into it as a pay review system, but there's more to it than that," the customer reflects. "We're now able to maximise the other information that's in there."
They're now using Compensation IQ for:
- Live recruitment benchmarking - "When we're putting our job adverts out, we know we're in the right ballpark"
- Quarterly business reporting - adding salary insights to regular stakeholder updates
- Absence cost analysis – "Previously, cost of absence was very intangible. Now we can say there is a cost based on day rate"
- Strategic workforce planning - understanding market trends before they hit

The Verdict? Compensation IQ delivered a Strategic Advantage
When asked about their overall experience, the Mando Group People team’s enthusiasm is palpable:
It's definitely saved us time. It's been interesting to cut that data in different ways. The opportunities... we've probably not fully explored it yet.
The transformation extends beyond just efficiency gains. They've moved from reactive, time-consuming salary reviews to proactive, strategic compensation management. "I think the more we can use it in different ways, the more we show that value rather than it being a once-a-year tool. The ability to extract that data, to cut it and get it out, is really helpful."
So how likely are you to recommend Compensation IQ to a colleague?
Mando Group gives Compensation IQ a solid 9 out of 10. The only thing preventing a perfect score? They'd love to see benefits benchmarking added to the platform!
"I think the onboarding, the ease of use, the data sets that are in there... the insights are just great."
The Bigger Picture: Thriving in Challenging Times
Mando Group's story isn't just about finding a better salary benchmarking tool – it's about how smart companies are adapting to thrive in challenging market conditions. In a sector where nearly half of agencies are struggling, having confidence in your compensation decisions can be the difference between losing talent to competitors and building a team that drives growth.
As Deanne Walsh, HRBP puts it:
We focused on doing the pay review and getting that across the line, which it was helpful. But Elinor (Summers, Office Manager) and I have looked at it and thought about ways we can incorporate it into our quarterly reporting – to give different perspectives into anything that might benefit the business.
For UK digital agencies and consultancies grappling with similar challenges – whether it's post-pandemic culture shifts, hybrid working complexities, or fierce competition for talent – Mando Group's transformation shows there's a better way forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Compensation IQ?
Compensation IQ is a salary benchmarking software that combines 3 different salary data sources in one platform - giving you all the information you need to make better decisions about pay. It integrates seamlessly with your HR data – so you can fast-track your salary review process, and be confident you’re making the right calls.
How does Compensation IQ differ to Brightmine Salary Survey Company?
Brightmine is a generalist HR Services company that (in addition to the professional services and resources) provides a comprehensive HR metrics benchmarking service, allowing organisations to compare their HR policies and practices against those of other employers. Users can benchmark metrics such as sickness absence rates, holiday entitlements, training budgets, and labour turnover. The data can be refined by organisation size, sector, and geographical region, enabling tailored comparisons.
In addition, Brightmine offers salary benchmarking data sourced from their customers via their salary surveys. The dataset is narrow with only 1.5 million employee datapoints, limiting the ablity to make the salary benchmarks relevant to industry, company size and location filters.
Compensation IQ, on the other hand, integrates an organisation's HR data with current market insights to facilitate efficient compensation reviews. The Compensation IQ salary benchmarkign software provides global salary data, from over 10 million companies, updated frequently..
In summary, while both platforms offer salary benchmarking, Brightmine focuses on a broad range of HR metrics and policies, allowing organisations to benchmark various HR practices. Compensation IQ specialises in salary benchmarking, providing tools for comprehensive compensation analysis and decision-making.
How do I choose between the different salary benchmarking companies?
Choosing between different salary benchmarking providers depends heavily on the type of data they use. Here’s a breakdown of the main sources and what to consider for each:
1. Salary Surveys
What it is: Traditional salary survey companies collect compensation data directly from participating customers, typically through HR and compensation teams. These surveys are often industry-specific and conducted annually or semi-annually.
Pros:
✅ High-quality, verified data directly from employers
✅ Industry and role-specific insights
✅ Usually follows a structured methodology for consistency
Cons:
❌ Data can be outdated quickly (often refreshed only once or twice a year)
❌ May exclude smaller companies or startups that don’t participate
❌ Expensive, especially for niche benchmarks
Best for: Enterprise HR teams, compensation consultants, and industries with well-established salary survey providers (e.g., finance, legal, healthcare).
2. Live Salary Benchmarking Data from HRIS Integrations
What it is: Tech Platforms that integrate with HR and payroll systems to pull real-time salary data directly from employers. This is a more modern approach, offering constantly updated compensation insights.
Pros:
✅ Live, up-to-date salary data
✅ Directly sourced from employer systems (reducing self-reporting bias)
✅ Allows for more granular analysis (e.g., company size, location, industry trends)
Cons:
❌ Dependent on getting enough companies to integrate for reliable benchmarks
❌ Data coverage can vary - may lack insights into specialised roles or industries
❌ Some platforms may struggle with normalising the data for consistency
Best for: Tech companies, startups, and fast-moving industries where real-time data is critical for hiring decisions.
3. Job Postings Data
What it is: A large amount of real-time salary benchmarking information extracted from publicly available job postings, sourced from job boards, company website and ATS providers.
Pros:
✅ Large volume of data across industries and roles
✅ Captures emerging trends in salary expectations and hiring demand
✅ Good for understanding market positioning and competitive pay ranges
Cons:
❌ Salaries in job ads often reflect hiring budgets, not actual paid salaries
❌ Can be skewed by companies that post ranges wider than what they actually pay
❌ Lacks insight into bonuses, equity, and internal pay structures
Best for: Companies needing a quick pulse check on salary trends, competitive positioning, and geographic pay differentials.
How to Choose a Salary Benchmarking Provider?
- For accuracy and reliability? Prioritise salary surveys or HRIS integrations.
- For real-time market trends? Look for HRIS integrations or job postings data.
- For competitive benchmarking in hiring? Job postings data can provide good external insights.
- For comprehensive benchmarking? Some providers like Compensation IQ combine multiple data sources for a more complete picture of salary benchmarking.